Quality Test

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by CrimsonScuba on September 18th 2011, 12:31 am

Ari Strike wrote:You act as if CA is a hard game to play..

It is with all the try hards. Cough cough
avatar
CrimsonScuba
BUSINESS KARAOKE ADMIN GUY

Posts : 821
Join date : 2011-05-08
Age : 23
Location : On the side of a River

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 18th 2011, 2:58 pm

heres a test using the MPEG4 setting. i played at 1024 x 600 cause my laptop would of probably exploded if i tried any higher.
MPEG4 looks much sharper to my eyes.

and excuse my non-existent lolaim.

avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Nett[le]s on September 18th 2011, 3:04 pm


This is what I mean by being able to read the chat at 360p.
1920x1080 full size rendered at 1920x1080 30fps
Though I think it would be better quality if I rendered at 1280x720 instead
avatar
Nett[le]s
Leader of Pantsu

Posts : 4031
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 23
Location : (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ Manhattan (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ

View user profile http://desumatch.forumclan.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 3:21 pm

1Pantsu wrote:heres a test using the MPEG4 setting. i played at 1024 x 600 cause my laptop would of probably exploded if i tried any higher.
MPEG4 looks much sharper to my eyes.

and excuse my non-existent lolaim.

How did you render it?
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 18th 2011, 3:37 pm

its unedited, so i didn't load it into Sony Vegas. i just encoded it through my usual way.

i'm not sure why Youtube washes out the text so much, it looked transparent to the original preupload. i'll see if i can make the text stand out more.
avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Nett[le]s on September 18th 2011, 3:38 pm

1Pantsu wrote:its unedited, so i didn't load it into Sony Vegas. i just encoded it through my usual way.

i'm not sure why Youtube washes out the text so much, it looked transparent to the original preupload. i'll see if i can make the text stand out more.
SV > Effects > Sharpen > 0.250
winner.
avatar
Nett[le]s
Leader of Pantsu

Posts : 4031
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 23
Location : (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ Manhattan (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ

View user profile http://desumatch.forumclan.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 3:39 pm

Working on another test. I'll upload it later.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 4:00 pm

Would it make a difference if I rendered it with 60FPS? I made a profile to do that. I don't think it did much because it still looks choppy. Blame my shit computer.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Erik on September 18th 2011, 4:04 pm

If you record at a lower FPS than 60. You wont magically gain FPS in the final product...
avatar
Erik
Banhammer Punching Bag

Posts : 1317
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 18th 2011, 4:11 pm

jooseizon SENRYAKU wrote:
1Pantsu wrote:its unedited, so i didn't load it into Sony Vegas. i just encoded it through my usual way.

i'm not sure why Youtube washes out the text so much, it looked transparent to the original preupload. i'll see if i can make the text stand out more.
SV > Effects > Sharpen > 0.250
winner.
i was thinking of using avisynth filters like a bauss XD
btw, epic ava.

@iggy: YouTube encodes at 30 FPS, so it really doesn't matter.
avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 4:41 pm

2nd Test on first page. You guys should look up to my good aiming.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Nett[le]s on September 18th 2011, 4:51 pm

Still looking a little blurry, but a huge improvement. Use MPEG-4 to record, not YouTube HD.
Framerate is still lolbad, looks like 10-12 FPS to me.
avatar
Nett[le]s
Leader of Pantsu

Posts : 4031
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 23
Location : (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ Manhattan (づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ

View user profile http://desumatch.forumclan.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by RainbowPantsu on September 18th 2011, 4:53 pm

RainbowPantsu wrote:Its a bit dark....
still. you can change it on yt i think lol
avatar
RainbowPantsu
Spammer

Posts : 1581
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 21
Location : Equestria catching Pokeponies.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Erik on September 18th 2011, 7:28 pm

LOL@SECOND VIDEO

"LEJOS IS HACKERING!"
avatar
Erik
Banhammer Punching Bag

Posts : 1317
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Rizen on September 18th 2011, 7:58 pm

1Pantsu wrote:heres a test using the MPEG4 setting. i played at 1024 x 600 cause my laptop would of probably exploded if i tried any higher.
MPEG4 looks much sharper to my eyes.

and excuse my non-existent lolaim.
Much better, I honestly don't see anything you can immediately work on besides your Vegas settings.
Could probably make 360p look better, or more like 720.
avatar
Rizen
Spammer

Posts : 1323
Join date : 2011-09-04
Age : 21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 18th 2011, 9:28 pm

i just experimented with MSharpen and Unsharp, the text looks much clearer, but i cant help but think the characters looks TOO sharp now, especially since i'm upscaling the original video.
i'll upload tomorrow....

i'm not doing any Vegas filtering tests because:
1) i don't play CA
2) i'm trying to learn avisynth for animu
avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 11:30 pm

Jewish wrote:LOL@SECOND VIDEO

"LEJOS IS HACKERING!"
Reptor: Who is DrLejos?
Iggy: Erik's master.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 18th 2011, 11:43 pm

jooseizon SENRYAKU wrote:Still looking a little blurry, but a huge improvement. Use MPEG-4 to record, not YouTube HD.
Framerate is still lolbad, looks like 10-12 FPS to me.
How2render it without it screwing up? When I load it on SV and even WMM, it plays weird.

EDIT: OSHIT MANG I THINK I FIXED IT SOMEHOW. I'LL RECORD SOME GAMEPLAY WITH IT LATER AND UPLOAD ANOTHER TEST. LOOKS SO MUCH LESS CHOPPY FOR SOME REASON.

EDIT 2: Actually, NOPE.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 19th 2011, 2:20 am

I adjusted the light on the 2nd video.

And shit mang. I guess I'll just have to wait for a better computer to record stuff.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Iggor on September 19th 2011, 3:05 am

I like how I lag less when using MPEG4. I drop like 5 FPS and it's the best setting for the ingame recorder. If I use the Half Size setting, I drop like 10.
avatar
Iggor
1G Spammer

Posts : 2591
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 73
Location : CombadArm

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Icky Sticky Love on September 19th 2011, 9:21 am

In-game recorder is baddd

Just recording in combat arms is bad. There's no demo function, doesn't work well with fraps, in-game recorder is shit and other programs often don't even record well.

I seriously record BC2 better than CA. It drops my fps by like 5-10 for BC2, and 40-50 for CA.

Shitty game.
avatar
Icky Sticky Love
Shoryuken

Posts : 3747
Join date : 2011-07-05
Age : 24
Location : Mormonia

View user profile http://youtube.com/emoaznmusician

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Careyious on September 19th 2011, 9:30 am

HONORABRE CHAIRMAN wrote:In-game recorder is baddd

Just recording in combat arms is bad. There's no demo function, doesn't work well with fraps, in-game recorder is shit and other programs often don't even record well.

I seriously record BC2 better than CA. It drops my fps by like 5-10 for BC2, and 40-50 for CA.

Shitty game.

Note the major difference between BC2 and CA. BC2 was a game that had a lot of time put in to make it a very good game. CA was made as another cash cow for Nexon.

Also, I'm not really seeing a problem with using fraps. I use it on 60fps to record and it's on full-size. The only problem is that it uses a shit-ton of space.
avatar
Careyious
Spammer

Posts : 1126
Join date : 2011-05-07
Age : 21
Location : Perth, Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 19th 2011, 9:57 am

much better?

avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by 1Pantsu on September 19th 2011, 1:07 pm

more sharpening, higher AQ (though probably a bad idea for YouTube).
avatar
1Pantsu
Lolicon
Lolicon

Posts : 4475
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 24
Location : fuck you nigger it wasn't me it was ari

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Icky Sticky Love on September 19th 2011, 1:15 pm

I can just tell from the still that the 2nd is too sharp.
The first one looks decent though.
avatar
Icky Sticky Love
Shoryuken

Posts : 3747
Join date : 2011-07-05
Age : 24
Location : Mormonia

View user profile http://youtube.com/emoaznmusician

Back to top Go down

Re: Quality Test

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum